Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Spirtuality...

I have never identified myself as a religious person, but I have never been able to dismiss the spiritual force, and its something I've been trying to identify for almost 10 years now, really ever since I came out as what we label a "gay man" (gender and biological sex labels were the norm for me then, and we'll keep that simple and separate...for now.) I felt, as many do, rejected by christian upbringing, and so my reaction was to sample out paganism for a while, always investing into a female divinity, a new one every week, and that ended up just slowly fading into a spiritual passivity, one that seriously questioned any existence. One thing I knew, God or whatever the hell it was, was not male. And if he was, well, color me atheist. I absolutely could not, and still will not, believe in a higher male power.

While living in Europe, the catholic churches (I was raised Catholic) always spoke to me via guilt, but more seriously, their placement of the Madonna on the hierarchy, and also the importance placed on female saints, of course they are overshadowed by the males, but Madonna was regarded very highly. I began to look at her as some kind of all-mother, something maternal, something caring, which may have stemmed from my catholic upbringing, which was spotty, and at times not really important to my family.

I was questioning things my parents themselves had never questioned, and thus was accused of hating god by my mother, which I didn't, but if god was a HE I had no use for HIM. simple.

It wasn't until what I refer to as my musical awakening, which happened when I bought a Tori Amos CD on a whim in January 2004. (It was Tales of Librarian, I thought the cover was cool). I seriously was into Tori, and had all her albums and almost all her beesides (it still lingers in my blood) in a matter of four months. Ani DiFranco, Bjork, and PJ Harvey were are also discovered shortly thereafter. It was like my own living matriarchy of sonic worship. in 2005 Amos' Beekeeper was released, along with her "auto-biography" Piece By Piece, which I just think was her random ideas sorted into a very difficult read, but editorial aside, the album, and most of the book, looked into Christian Spirituality, and woman's place in it. Through both, some research and a brilliant professor at my crummy Alabamian community college, I was able to ascertain the gnostic gospels spoke of a higher divinity, a female divinity. I saw Amos in Atlanta, GA that summer, and during an improv, that still sticks with me, she loosely referred to abortion. She said, and I paraphrase from memory;

"Girls, if the government tries to tell you what to do with your body, ask to see their mother. If
their mother says its because of God, ask to see his mother. Everybody has a mother."

Incidentally, Amos opened every concert of this tour with her song : "Original Sinsuality", and had this giant paper tree that looked like a kindergarten project, complete with an apple and a snake, erected behind her. The lyrics to the song are as follows:


There was a Garden,
in the beginning,
Before the Fall
Before Genesis.

There was a tree there,
a tree of Knowledge
Sophia would insist
You must eat of this

Original Sin?
No, I don't think so,
Original Sinsuality.
Original Sin?
No It should be,
Original Sinsuality.

Yaldaboath, Saklas, I'm calling you
Samael
You are not alone
I Say
You are not alone
In your Darkness
You are not alone baby
You are not alone

The genesis allusions are very clear, but who is Sophia? What about Yaldaboath, Saklas, Samael?
I haven't figured out how to copy and paste yet, so, I'll paraphrase. I gnostic belief, Sophia, the divine wisdom, gave birth to the (note: THE, singular, thus a separate entity) god that created the world, they both eminate from a longer line of aeons that descend from Monad, or the ultimate being. Thus, and logically, Sophia is the mother of the Christian God. Also in Gnostic belief, it was Sophia who offered Eve the fruit of knowledge in order to grant that gift, and even in the bible: "And the LORD God said "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever." - Genesis 3:22.

So, were Adam and Eve shunned from Eden from disobeying, or for fear of their becoming immortal? Debate rages, but I firmly believe in the old feminist cliche "Eve was framed ." She was, no question asked, and a patriarchal religious text and thus history, was formed around her misdemeanor, and Sophia forsaken, and replaced by Satan, because even a woman could not tempt another woman, and the crime was forced to fit the punishment, Eve disobeyed and did it while listening to the evilest of evils, Gods arch nemesis, another who disobeyed. The lesson in the most obvious of statements: do not disobey the patriarchy. And do not recognize a power higher then that patriarchy. Do NOT ask for their mother.

This is my belief, We are entitled to that. I believe in a higher feminine divine, one that creates, nurtures and teaches. This is gender assignment, I know, because the obvious opposition is a Male divinity that punishes and destroys, Old Testament, anybody? But I think we should refer to other divinities as well that challenge this, example, Kali Ra, who in Hinduism is in control of creation and destruction, and, while others like Shiva switch genders, Kali is almost always woman. I digress, because gender is just as messy as religion and spirituality, and more questions and debate can be spurned from A maternal divinity, such as if maternal ism is instinct, etc etc. The human mind can divide and analyze almost anything, and maybe what we personify as our higher spiritual being may be an anthromorphication into what has been programmed into ourselves by society, personal experience and education. I have always had a fear of men, have always distrusted men, and define my gender, but not biological sex, as woman (because it falls into the boxes of society places as "feminine", or "woman" so naturally, I would want a woman in the reigns. What man and woman are is something to look into for another time.

Now, after I have splurged about Tori Amos, Sophia, Eve, and Patriarchy, what did I accomplish? Did I explain anything? Did I make random points? Yes, I did, but these are the things that comfort me, and gave me an answer for the unknown. Maybe it was an answer I wanted to hear, that I would find comforting, but none the less, its my answer.

I saw Tori Amos again about a month ago in DC, on a whim because free tickets fell into my lap, and the setlist, her performance and the aura had this spiritual re-awakening for me, something sparked, and as it was the first time I encountered Amos in 2004, it was as if she was handing me an apple, giving me knowledge. But, not her as an individual, her as a vehicle for something much bigger. She has described herself as some vessel her songs come into to find an outlet, an Aeolian Harp, if you will, and maybe that is true. The entire show she played with an energy so fierce, and with improvs that connected and spanned the show, about challenging the patriarchy, about finding oneself in this mess of a world, it spoke to me, whatever it was, something was there, and as abstract and insane and tori fan zealot as it sounds, I truly felt this. During her encore, she came out and danced to the clapping in this very primitive way that instantly reminded me of Ishtar, the old Babylonian goddess of dance and sex (who I think was twisted into Mother Harlot, or The Whore Of Babylon ala Revelations. but don't quote me). I feel that those tickets didn't fall into my lap, and that I was, in a way, beckoned to this show, not to become a Toriphile again, as I was years ago, but to have faith once again in the Feminine Divine. And I found it.

2 comments:

  1. It shocks me that no one has commented on this. It's a fascinating insight into something very personal, and I've never heard a (biological) male tap into something I felt-- quite like that.

    Wow, Mitch. You know more about this than I do, and that's a bit shameful. Shouldn't we all have looked into this more, as you have? So glad you shared and that I know you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why thank you Jill. I'm glad that you commented, haha, although I'm late on the uptake (I just discovered your comment now). Its something that I've pieced together by years of thought and reading, but is something that I take quite seriously, for I do consider the feminine divine to be intristic with my very being.

    And don't feel shameful, haha, we all know what we know, and if it was all the same, the world would be dreadfully dull. I'm glad I know you too dear, we need to meet again, ASAP.

    ReplyDelete